ArticleACS sensors2025
A Comparative Evaluation of Microimpedance Tomography Reconstruction Algorithms for in Vitro Imaging.
Article in ACS sensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents the development of a novel miniature electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system made out of glass, along with the training, validation, and testing of an accompanying open-source machine learning image reconstruction model. Our 1-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) models were uniquely benchmarked, both qualitatively and quantitatively, using synthetic and experimental data, against well-established image reconstruction methods: the one-step Gauss-Newton method and the total variation reconstruction method. Image reconstruction results obtained using our 1D-CNN show significant advantages over these traditional methods, achieving an up to 5-fold reduction in mean square error on synthetic data. These results were replicated for two common excitation/measurement modes and extended to objects with varying conductivity and quantities. The superior EIT reconstruction capabilities of our 1D-CNN were further validated experimentally across a similarly broad range of parameters, achieving an average positional accuracy of 147 μm and an average dimensional resolution of 70 μm. To demonstrate potential applications in in vitro monitoring, we used our platform to observe zebrafish development through three distinct phases, from embryo to larvae, showcasing our platform's compatibility with biological imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.