ReviewDie Anaesthesiologie2025
[Culture as a success factor: why organizational and team culture in high-risk areas of medicine deserve more attention].
Review in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn high-risk areas of medicine, such as anesthesiology, intensive care, emergency medicine and pain management, existing organizational and team cultures can significantly impede the delivery of effective and safe care. A predominantly numbers-driven management approach, structural overload and sometimes insufficient leadership competency contribute to overburdening, demotivation and the departure of key personnel. This in turn exacerbates the already critical shortage of healthcare professionals. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study explores the extent to which a targeted transformation toward a Just Culture, a culture of fairness and trust, can enhance patient safety, improve staff well-being and sustainably support the performance and economic resilience of medical organizations. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study is based on a narrative review of the current literature on the topic of Just Culture, leadership, error and learning culture and team development. In addition, selected practical examples from the German and international healthcare sectors were analyzed. The review also incorporated studies on the effectiveness of (simulation) training and incident reporting and learning systems.
resultsThe introduction of a Just Culture promotes a climate of trust, fairness and continuous learning in the workplace. It facilitates open communication about adverse events, supports systematic root cause analysis and reduces individual blame. Staff report increased psychological safety, reduced work-related stress and higher job satisfaction. Modern leadership approaches, such as transformational, shared and humble leadership, can further enhance teamwork and care quality. Evidence also suggests positive effects on employee retention and organizational performance, although causal relationships remain underexplored. DISCUSSION: An organizational culture shaped by Just Culture principles constitutes a key success factor for healthcare institutions. It fosters psychological safety, strengthens a sense of responsibility and enables collective learning; however, successful implementation requires a targeted evolution of leadership structures, continuous training and the development of supportive frameworks, such as reporting systems and interprofessional reflection formats. When effectively implemented, Just Culture can help secure care quality, retain skilled professionals and create a strategic advantage in an increasingly complex and economically pressured healthcare environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41196331What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.