SynthesisAging clinical and experimental research2025
Association of sarcopenic obesity with cognitive dysfunction and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between sarcopenic obesity and mild cognitive impairment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCurrently, the association of sarcopenic obesity (SO) with cognitive dysfunction and dementia remains unclear. This study aims to investigate their potential association. MATERIALS AND
methodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched until 30 December 2024. Observational studies investigating the association of SO with cognitive dysfunction and dementia were included. A random-effects model was applied for meta-analysis.
resultsSeventeen studies with 274,996 participants were included, of which 11 were included in quantitative analyses. The pooled odds ratio for cognitive dysfunction in patients with SO versus non-SO was 1.71 (95% CI: 1.39-2.11, p < 0.001, I
conclusionsSO appears associated with cognitive dysfunction. However, due to high heterogeneity, very low certainty of evidence, and potential biases, these results should be interpreted cautiously. Future high-quality prospective studies are needed to validate this conclusion. PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251011745.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.