Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41196529›Full record

ArticleDiscover mental health2025

Clinicians' perspectives of managing common mental disorders among pregnant women in primary care settings: a qualitative exploratory study.

Sandra Fremah Asare, Samuel Adjorlolo, Petra Brysiewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sandra Fremah AsareDiscipline of Nursing. School of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa. asarefrema6@gmail.com.
Samuel AdjorloloMental Nursing Department. School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Petra BrysiewiczDiscipline of Nursing. School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary antenatal care providers are seen as instrumental in shaping healthy pregnancy outcomes. However, there are organizational and system-level barriers that hinder the needed support for mental health care among pregnant women and there remains a dearth of research exploring the specific challenges and opportunities encountered by clinicians in providing mental health support to pregnant women with common mental disorders (CMDs) in the prenatal period.

aimThis study explored clinicians' (obstetric providers) perspectives in managing CMDs among women during the prenatal period.

methodsThis study employed a qualitative exploratory design. Twelve interviews were conducted with clinicians (doctors and midwives) working in primary care settings, guided by a semi-structured interview guide. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

resultsManaging CMDs in pregnancy was described as not a priority as illustrated in five categories: many warning signs, relying on own experiences, no time, overwhelmed in a role, and working with families.

conclusionsThis study's findings suggest that primary healthcare obstetric practice does not have the required training in mental health among clinicians to screen and treat for CMDs in pregnant women in Ghana. Therefore, healthcare facilities must prioritize the integration of mental health services within routine obstetric care, ensuring that pregnant women have access to comprehensive mental health interventions alongside their routine antenatal care.

Identifiers

PMID41196529
PMCPMC12592609

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.