ArticlePloS one2025
Association of erythropoietin gene polymorphism (rs1617640 C>T/G) with diabetic retinopathy in Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients of Punjabi population in Pakistan.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of vision loss in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and is influenced by genetic factors. We investigated the association between the erythropoietin (EPO) gene polymorphism (rs1617640 C > T/G) and DR risk in a Punjabi Pakistani cohort of adults with T2DM. In a case-control design, 573 T2DM patients (294 with DR, 279 controls without retinopathy, CDR) were genotyped by ARMS-PCR. The protective CC genotype was significantly more frequent in controls (96.77%) than in cases (30.61%) and was associated with markedly reduced DR risk (OR = 68; 95% CI 33.468-138.162; p < 0.001). Conversely, the GG and TT genotypes were absent in controls but present in DR patients (27.55% and 21.43%, respectively) and were strongly associated with increased DR risk (p < 0.001). Allele-level analysis mirrored genotype findings: the C allele predominated in controls (98.39%) but was significantly less frequent in cases (39%), while G and T alleles were enriched among DR patients (p < 0.001). Together, genotype- and allele-based results indicate that the rs1617640 C variant is protective against DR in this Punjabi T2DM population, whereas G and T variants increase DR susceptibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.