ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring Cadaba fruticosa bioactive compounds for oral cancer an in silico and in vitro approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Female Serum HER2 Expression: Its Association With Metabolic Syndrome and Treatment Drug Response.International journal of endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the efficacy of phytotherapy in treating oral cancer. This study evaluated the phytocompounds extracted from Cadaba fruticosa for anticancer potential using GC-MS analysis. A total of 10 bioactive phytocompounds were identified, of which 3,5-dichloro benzyl propyl ester emerged as a highly potent candidate. A pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using SwissADME, and the selected compound did not adhere to Lipinski's rule of five, indicating no toxicity. A network pharmacology and molecular docking study was conducted to investigate the interaction between these compounds and the target proteins of oral cancer. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database provided 10 hub genes associated with critical pathways: EGFR, MAPK3, PPARG, MTOR, KRAS, MDM2, ERBB2, IRS1, HRAS, and JAK2. Molecular docking studies confirmed strong binding interactions between 3,5-dichlorobenzyl propyl ester and the oral cancer protein SMAD, which had binding energy of -7.9 kcal/mol and interactions with the amino acids TYR280 (2.89 Å), ARG285 (3.04 Å), THR413 (3.21 Å), ARG415 (2.98 Å) and SER276 (2.09 Å), TYR280 (3.74 Å), THR289 (4.09 Å), ARG285 (4.31 Å), ARG415 (3.63 Å), ARG410 (3.54 Å), HIS441 (5.07 Å), PRO360 (4.45 Å), ARG410 (4.46 Å), ARG410 (4.93 Å) and ALA278 (4.34 Å). A molecular dynamics simulation was performed over 200 ns and showed the complex stable, with RMSD values ranging from 0.2 to 0.8 nm. Apoptotic gene expression analysis of KB-1 oral cancer cell lines showed downregulation of Bcl-2 and upregulation of pro-apoptotic genes BAD, BAX, and caspase-3 at an IC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.