Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41198817›Full record

ReviewCommunications biology2025

The need for speed: drivers and consequences of accelerated replication forks.

Dávid Lukáč, Katarína Chromá, Pavel Moudrý

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dávid Lukáč *Laboratory of Genome Integrity, Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia.
Katarína Chromá *Laboratory of Genome Integrity, Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0141-0469
Pavel MoudrýLaboratory of Genome Integrity, Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia. pavel.moudry@upol.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1479-007X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The modulation of DNA replication dynamics has emerged as a key area of study in understanding genome stability and its perturbations in various physiological and pathological contexts. Replication fork rate is influenced by a variety of factors, including DNA repair pathways, origin firing, chromatin organization, transcription, and oncogenic signaling. This review highlights recent findings on the molecular mechanisms driving replication fork acceleration, focusing on scenarios such as PARP inhibition, oncogene activation, depletion of replication factors, and defects in Okazaki fragment processing. We discuss how reduced origin firing, R-loop resolution, and metabolic changes contribute to fork rate modulation, as well as the involvement of innate immune signaling, particularly through pathways such as cGAS-STING and ISG15. Special attention is given to consequences of accelerated replication forks for genome stability and their role in disease progression, particularly cancer. By unraveling the molecular mechanisms of fork acceleration, this Mini Review underscores its critical role in shaping genome integrity and cellular homeostasis, providing insights into future research directions and therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationGenomic InstabilityAnimalsDNA RepairHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID41198817
PMCPMC12592472

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.