Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41198834›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Three-year assessment of integrated vector management in Attica, Greece: results from surveillance and control activities.

Pascale C Stiles, Georgios Balatsos, Prasad Liyanage, Jerome N Baron, Maria Sakellariou Sofianou, Marina Bisia, Vasileios Karras, Till Bärnighausen, Eleni Patsoula, Joacim Rocklöv and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Pascale C Stiles *Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6431-2519
Georgios Balatsos *Laboratory of Insects & Parasites of Medical Importance, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, Kifisia, Greece.
Prasad LiyanageHeidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jerome N BaronHeidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Maria Sakellariou SofianouLaboratory of Insects & Parasites of Medical Importance, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, Kifisia, Greece.
Marina BisiaLaboratory of Insects & Parasites of Medical Importance, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, Kifisia, Greece.
Vasileios KarrasLaboratory of Insects & Parasites of Medical Importance, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, Kifisia, Greece.
Till BärnighausenHeidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4182-4212
Eleni PatsoulaUnit of Medical Entomology, Laboratory for the Surveillance of Infectious Diseases (LSID), Division of Infectious, Parasitic Diseases and Zoonoses, Department of Public Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
Joacim RocklövHeidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4030-0449
Antonios MichaelakisLaboratory of Insects & Parasites of Medical Importance, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, Kifisia, Greece. a.michaelakis@bpi.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3075-5020
Aditi BunkerHeidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. aditi.bunker@uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5906-156X

Funding

EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 101057554EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 101086640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The West Nile virus vector Culex pipiens and invasive species Aedes albopictus are abundant in Attica, Greece, which deploys an integrated vector management program for targeted vector control. The objective of our study is to evaluate the effects of this program on mosquito vector populations. Using mosquito surveillance and intervention occurrence data, we assessed the effects of mosquito control interventions on vector populations using a two-stage interrupted time series (ITS) approach. First, we fitted ITS models to 16 weeks of data centered on the week of each unique species-specific intervention. Second, we pooled the estimated coefficients in a meta-regression model. Following vector control interventions at the targeted intervention sites, we observed an overall 34% reduction (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.50-0.89) in Culex pipiens counts and a nonsignificant 5% increase (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.81-1.35) in Aedes albopictus counts, compared to the pre-intervention period. These results support the implementation in reducing Culex pipiens populations in Attica as part of an integrated public health plan to mitigate West Nile virus risk. However, the limited impact on Ae. albopictus suggests the need for complementary strategies beyond conventional biocides. Overall, this study could serve a model for evaluating IVM programs in diverse settings.

Indexed as

AedesCulexMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsWest Nile FeverAnimalsGreeceWest Nile virus

Identifiers

PMID41198834
PMCPMC12592716

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.