ArticleScientific reports2025
Estimation of daily energy requirements using a hybrid artificial intelligence model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately estimating energy requirements is critical for individuals to maintain a healthy life. Traditional methods may be time-consuming, complex, low in accuracy, and costly, thus creating a need for new approaches. This study explores the applicability of hybrid artificial intelligence models for calculating daily energy requirements based on individuals' anthropometric measurements and demographic data. The study's primary goal is to develop a model that offers a reliable and practical solution with higher accuracy than existing methods while ensuring ease of use in field settings. This study used data collected from volunteer individuals at Sakarya University between September 2023 and February 2024. Anthropometric measurements were performed by a bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) device, and demographic data were obtained through face-to-face surveys. Eighty-seven features were analyzed using the Spearman feature selection algorithm, and these were utilized to estimate energy requirements. Based on collaborative hybridization, the hybrid artificial intelligence model integrates three distinct Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) models using squared exponential, rational quadratic, and Matern52 kernels. These models were structured based on gender, and performance evaluation was carried out using criteria such as MAPE, MAD, MSE, R, and R². The best model performance in males was achieved at level 10 with 100% R², while the highest accuracy in females was observed at level 15. To increase model simplicity, the PCA method was applied; however, a decrease in performance was detected (R = 0.48, R² = 0.23). The accuracy of the artificial intelligence models proposed in this study was significantly higher than that of traditional formulas commonly preferred in the current literature. Hybrid artificial intelligence models offer practicality, accuracy, and flexibility in estimating energy requirements. Gender-based modeling has enhanced prediction performance while providing more reliable results by accounting for individual differences. This approach holds significant potential for advancing health and nutritional sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.