Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199070›Full record

ArticleMolecular systems biology2026

Cell cycle criticality as a mechanism for robust cell population control.

Benjamin D Simons, Omer Karin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular systems biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin D SimonsDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0WA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3875-7071
Omer KarinDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. o.karin@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9426-5362

Funding

Royal Society (The Royal Society) RSRP/R/231004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue homeostasis requires a precise balance between stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. While fate decisions are known to be closely linked with cell cycle progression, the functional significance of this relationship is unclear. We propose a mechanistic framework to analyse cellular dynamics when cell fate is coupled to cell cycle duration. Our model highlights a unique aspect of cell cycle regulation where mitogens serve as control parameters for a bifurcation governing the G1-S transition. Under competitive feedback from cell-cell interactions, the cell cycle regulatory network fine-tunes near the critical point of this bifurcation. Critical positioning lengthens G1 while amplifying cell-to-cell variability in mitogenic signalling and biochemical states. Such regulation confers significant advantages for controlling cell population dynamics, with alternative topologies enabling rapid tissue growth and repair or efficient mutant rejection. Counter-intuitively, we propose that stem cells may couple prolonged G1 with increased self-renewal propensity to efficiently suppress mis-sensing mutants. Our theory provides a distinct explanation to dynamical and statistical patterns of G1 lengthening and predicts regulatory strategies across development, homeostasis, and ageing.

Indexed as

Cell CycleAnimalsCell CommunicationCell DifferentiationG1 PhaseHomeostasisHumansModels, BiologicalSignal TransductionStem CellsBifurcationCell CycleMathematical ModellingStem CellsTissue Homeostasis

Identifiers

PMID41199070
PMCPMC12864836

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.