ArticleMolecular systems biology2026
Cell cycle criticality as a mechanism for robust cell population control.
Article in Molecular systems biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lipid nanoparticles as active biointerfaces: From membrane interaction to systemic dysregulation.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Time-dependent bistability leads to critical slowing down during floral transition in Arabidopsis.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue homeostasis requires a precise balance between stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. While fate decisions are known to be closely linked with cell cycle progression, the functional significance of this relationship is unclear. We propose a mechanistic framework to analyse cellular dynamics when cell fate is coupled to cell cycle duration. Our model highlights a unique aspect of cell cycle regulation where mitogens serve as control parameters for a bifurcation governing the G1-S transition. Under competitive feedback from cell-cell interactions, the cell cycle regulatory network fine-tunes near the critical point of this bifurcation. Critical positioning lengthens G1 while amplifying cell-to-cell variability in mitogenic signalling and biochemical states. Such regulation confers significant advantages for controlling cell population dynamics, with alternative topologies enabling rapid tissue growth and repair or efficient mutant rejection. Counter-intuitively, we propose that stem cells may couple prolonged G1 with increased self-renewal propensity to efficiently suppress mis-sensing mutants. Our theory provides a distinct explanation to dynamical and statistical patterns of G1 lengthening and predicts regulatory strategies across development, homeostasis, and ageing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.