ReviewThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2025
GALENOS approach to triangulating evidence (GATE): transforming the landscape of psychiatric research.
Review in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research agenda to advance anhedonia assessment, understanding and treatment: an ECNP-GALENOS expert meeting report.BMJ mental health · 2026Review
- The GALENOS approach to triangulating evidence: a structured approach for integrating information from human and animal studies.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- A Paradigm Shift in Progress: Generative AI's Evolving Role in Mental Health Care.JMIR mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is an urgent need for better evidence-based interventions in mental health. High-quality randomised controlled trials in humans are often lacking, especially when dealing with complex situations or novel therapeutic targets. Other potentially useful data may be available, such as from early-phase trials, observational or mechanistic studies or animal experiments. Triangulation offers an opportunity to consider a wider variety of evidence together to prioritise future research directions, and ultimately to inform clinical decisions. Here we describe GATE (the GALENOS Approach to Triangulating Evidence). This is the methodology of triangulation, co-produced with people with lived experience, and applied as an integral part of the GALENOS project (Global Alliance for Living Evidence on aNxiety, depressiOn and pSychosis; https://www.galenos.org.uk/). We outline the considerations of triangulation in psychiatry and our experience to date in assessing animal and human data together, using triangulation to prioritise future research directions. With GATE at its core, GALENOS not only enables novel insights to emerge, but points us towards a future of collaborative research better equipped to examine the most pressing questions in mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.