Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199459›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2025

GALENOS approach to triangulating evidence (GATE): transforming the landscape of psychiatric research.

Katharine A Smith, James Downs, Emma S J Robinson, Gin S Malhi, Jennifer Potts, Thomy Tonia, Georgia Salanti, Andrea Cipriani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katharine A SmithDepartment of Psychiatry, https://ror.org/052gg0110University of Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2679-1472
James DownsMQ Mental Health Research, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4321-8574
Emma S J RobinsonSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, UK.
Gin S MalhiDepartment of Psychiatry, https://ror.org/052gg0110University of Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4524-9091
Jennifer PottsDepartment of Psychiatry, https://ror.org/052gg0110University of Oxford, UK.
Thomy ToniaInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Georgia SalantiInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Andrea CiprianiDepartment of Psychiatry, https://ror.org/052gg0110University of Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5179-8321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an urgent need for better evidence-based interventions in mental health. High-quality randomised controlled trials in humans are often lacking, especially when dealing with complex situations or novel therapeutic targets. Other potentially useful data may be available, such as from early-phase trials, observational or mechanistic studies or animal experiments. Triangulation offers an opportunity to consider a wider variety of evidence together to prioritise future research directions, and ultimately to inform clinical decisions. Here we describe GATE (the GALENOS Approach to Triangulating Evidence). This is the methodology of triangulation, co-produced with people with lived experience, and applied as an integral part of the GALENOS project (Global Alliance for Living Evidence on aNxiety, depressiOn and pSychosis; https://www.galenos.org.uk/). We outline the considerations of triangulation in psychiatry and our experience to date in assessing animal and human data together, using triangulation to prioritise future research directions. With GATE at its core, GALENOS not only enables novel insights to emerge, but points us towards a future of collaborative research better equipped to examine the most pressing questions in mental health.

Indexed as

co-productionevidence synthesisLiving systematic reviewrisk of biastriangulation

Identifiers

PMID41199459
PMCPMC7619210

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.