ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Facial Injectable Fillers in Aesthetic Medicine: Clinical Applications and Safety Strategies.
Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regenerative Functional Microspheres for Aesthetic Medicine: Mechanism, Materials, Fabrication, and Clinical Applications.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Review
- Comparative Effects of Injectable Biostimulatory Agents (Calcium Hydroxyapatite, New Cellular Treatment Factor, VAMP, and Human Exosomes) and Their Combination on Skin Regeneration.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the increasing demand for facial rejuvenation and aesthetic enhancement, the use of facial injectable fillers has rapidly expanded and become one of the most widely used cosmetic procedures. These fillers are primarily used for facial rejuvenation, soft tissue augmentation, wrinkle removal, and correcting volume loss or facial disproportion caused by aging, trauma, or infection. Commonly used materials include hyaluronic acid, polycaprolactone, calcium hydroxylapatite, and poly-L-lactic acid, each offering unique benefits in terms of safety, durability, and biocompatibility. Additionally, the longevity and mechanism of action vary significantly among fillers. Hyaluronic acid provides immediate volume but requires crosslinking for durability, while polycaprolactone and poly-L-lactic acid stimulate collagen production for longer-lasting effects. Minimally invasive procedures with injectable fillers provide advantages such as enhanced privacy, reduced recovery time, and lower risk, compared with traditional surgery. However, potential adverse reactions - ranging from mild swelling and pain to severe complications, such as vascular occlusion, nodules, and even blindness - remain a critical concern. A thorough understanding of facial anatomy, particularly of vascular danger zones, is essential to mitigate risks, such as tissue necrosis and vision loss. In this review, we comprehensively analyze the properties, clinical applications, and mechanisms of action of major filler materials, while emphasizing reported complications and their management strategies. By integrating current evidence, we aim to guide clinicians in selecting appropriate fillers, optimizing injection techniques, and minimizing risks, thereby improving patient outcomes in aesthetic medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.