ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Real-World Off-Label Use of Semaglutide for Weight Reduction: User Behavior, Effectiveness, and Satisfaction.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hongkou Advanced Research on Metabolism and Obesity iNtervention studY (HARMONY): a protocol for a longitudinal cohort study.BMJ open · 2026Observational
- [Semaglutide and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review].Acta gastroenterologica LatinoamericanaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Off-label use of semaglutide as Ozempic Objective: To assess utilization patterns, effectiveness, and patient satisfaction with off-label Ozempic use for weight reduction across Arab populations. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a validated bilingual questionnaire. Data included demographics, source of initiation, dose escalation, treatment duration, weight changes, and satisfaction. Analyses examined associations between demographics, treatment initiation source, dose escalation adherence, weight loss, and satisfaction. Results: Analysis included 626 users. Nearly one-third of users (30.6%) self-initiated Ozempic, most based on independent self-learning and social media. Most (72.4%) used Ozempic solely for weight reduction, with a further 20.1% for both weight loss and diabetes control. About two thirds (69.3%) started at the recommended 0.25 mg dose, significantly more often in users with physician-led initiation (p<0.05). Only 20.3% followed standard dose escalation. Of those who stopped Ozempic, 59.7% discontinued the drug early before reaching 12 weeks of use including 4 weeks at the 1.0 mg dose. Among those who discontinued, treatment duration was longer in users with physician-led initiation. Despite erratic use, reported mean weight loss by 8-12 weeks exceeded 5% in most subgroups, with no statistically significant differences across 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg doses. Satisfaction, reported by 56.5% of users, was positively correlated with weight loss and shifted into the positive satisfaction level at an estimated weight reduction of 11.6%. Conclusion: Off-label Ozempic use in Arab populations is characterized by widespread self-initiation, irregular dosing, and early discontinuation. Nonetheless, clinically meaningful weight loss was achieved in many users. These findings emphasize the need for structured counseling to optimize outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.