SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Tongxinluo capsule for acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical and preclinical effects of Tongxinluo Capsule (TXL) on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to summarize reported mechanisms of action, thereby informing clinical decision-making and future research. Methods: A comprehensive computerized search of eight databases and four clinical trial registries was performed from their inception until 1 April 2025. Data extraction, quality assessment and analysis were conducted in strict accordance with predefined protocols. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the RoB-2 and SYRCLE tools. Statistical analyses were carried out using RevMan 5.4 software, employing fixed-effect or random-effects models as appropriate. Results: This review included 54 clinical studies (4,353 patients in trail group; 4,296 patients in control group) and 11 animal studies (95 animals in trail group; 94 animals in control group). Meta-analysis of clinical studies indicated that, compared with control groups, TXL was associated with lower all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and incidence of myocardial reinfarction (P < 0.05). Compared with control groups, TXL was associated with lower incidence of repeated revascularization, heart failure, angina pectoris, and arrhythmias (P < 0.05). Furthermore, TXL demonstrated greater improvement in cardiac function indicators and vascular endothelial function (P < 0.001), alongside significant reductions in blood lipids levels (TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C; P < 0.05) and inflammation markers. TXL was associated with fewer adverse reactions (P = 0.01), primarily gastrointestinal in nature. In animal studies, TXL was correlated with lower myocardial infarction area and the no-reflow area (P < 0.001), higher cardiac function indicators (LVEF and LVFS; P < 0.05) and better vascular endothelial function (P < 0.05) compared to control group. Reported biological mechanisms of TXL include inhibition of apoptosis, suppression of inflammation, protection of cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells, promotion of angiogenesis, and synergistic lipid-lowering and plaque-stabilization effects. Conclusion: This study is the first meta-analysis to integrate both clinical and animal research on TXL for AMI. The finding suggests that TXL may be associated with alterations in left ventricular systolic function and clinical prognosis, potentially mediated through mechanisms such as inhibition of apoptosis, protecting endothelial function, reducing of inflammation, preservation of cardiomyocytes, and promotion of angiogenesis. Limitations of the included studies constrain the strength of these conclusions, and further validation through larger, high-quality randomized controlled trials is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.