ArticleAfrican journal of laboratory medicine2025
Knowledge, competence, experience of healthcare practitioners using glucometers for patient care in Nigeria.
Article in African journal of laboratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the widespread acceptability of glucometers as a blood glucose self-monitoring and point-of-care device, their usage is confronted with operational, technical, regulatory, and quality control concerns. Objective: This study assessed knowledge, estimated competence, and measured experience of healthcare practitioners using glucometers for patient care in two states of Northern Nigeria. Methods: This cross-sectional, descriptive study used a total population sampling strategy and self-completed questionnaires. A total of 768 questionnaires were distributed to hospitals in Jigawa and Kogi States, Nigeria, from December 2019 to April 2022. The questionnaire had three sections: collecting details about type of healthcare facility, sociodemographic characteristics and educational qualifications of participants, and assessment of knowledge, competence and practice. Data were analysed and results expressed as frequencies and percentages. Results: Overall, 570 questionnaires were filled and retrieved, giving a response rate of 74.2%. Most of the participants were male (312; 54.7%); female participants totalled 258 (45.3%). Most participants were aged < 50 years (25-40 years, 215 [37.7%]; 41-50 years, 246 [43.2%]). The majority of participants were Medical Laboratory Scientists (124, 21.8%]), Technicians (151, 26.5%), or Nurses (132, 23.2%). Most participants (284, 49.8%) reported having no formal training prior to first use of glucometers in patient care. Many participants (379, 66.5%) knew about glucometer calibrators; 235 (41.2%) did not know what specific purpose calibrators served. Conclusion: This study found a lack of knowledge, competence and experience among healthcare practitioners, especially for hands-on use of glucometer calibrators and standard operating procedures for blood glucose testing using glucometers. What this study adds: The study brings to fore the need for training and retraining of healthcare practitioners on the theoretical and practical skills required for operating glucometers. Periodic calibration of glucometers and provision of quality control materials should be incorporated into standard operating procedures at point-of-care testing workstations in health facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.