ArticleFood science & nutrition2025
Analysis of Different Parts of Broccoli (
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of the Use of Carrots, Cauliflower and Broccoli Waste Materials as a Matrix for Thiamine.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Analysis of Different Parts of Broccoli (Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The disposal of broccoli by-products, such as broccoli leaves and stems, can potentially have harmful impacts on the environment. However, these by-products may contain substantial amounts of phytochemical compounds with potential health benefits. In this study, the phytochemical composition and antioxidant activities of different parts of broccoli leaves, such as leaf blades and petioles, were analyzed to identify their potential use as functional food materials. Ten glucosinolates, 1 nitrile, 1 isothiocyanate, 14 hydroxycinnamic acids, 3 benzoic acids, 5 flavonoids, and 1 lignan were detected in the broccoli leaf blades, whereas 10 glucosinolates, 1 nitrile, 1 isothiocyanate, 11 hydroxycinnamic acids, 3 benzoic acids, 0 flavonoid, and 1 lignan were detected in the petioles. Antioxidant activity was consistently high in the leaf blades, indicating greater accumulation of bioactive compounds in the blades. Furthermore, broccoli leaf blades were subjected to different cooking methods (boiling, steaming, and sous-vide) to assess changes in antioxidant activities, and sulforaphane content. Significant differences were observed depending on the cooking method, with steaming and sous-vide methods demonstrating greater antioxidant activity than that of boiling. Although both boiling and steaming resulted in a reduction in sulforaphane content compared with that of the raw samples, the sous-vide method led to an increase in sulforaphane content. In conclusion, broccoli leaf blades have superior phytochemical composition and antioxidant activities, and when broccoli leaf blades are cooked sous-vide, the retention of bioactive compounds is the highest, suggesting that health functional foods can be developed through food upcycling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.