Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41200212›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2025

Analysis of Different Parts of Broccoli (

Min Gyeong Kim, Ju Hong Park, Nami Joo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Analysis of Different Parts of Broccoli (Food science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Min Gyeong KimDepartment of Food and Nutrition Sookmyung Women's University Seoul Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8828-6448
Ju Hong ParkDepartment of Convergence IT Engineering Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH) Pohang Republic of Korea.
Nami JooDepartment of Food and Nutrition Sookmyung Women's University Seoul Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The disposal of broccoli by-products, such as broccoli leaves and stems, can potentially have harmful impacts on the environment. However, these by-products may contain substantial amounts of phytochemical compounds with potential health benefits. In this study, the phytochemical composition and antioxidant activities of different parts of broccoli leaves, such as leaf blades and petioles, were analyzed to identify their potential use as functional food materials. Ten glucosinolates, 1 nitrile, 1 isothiocyanate, 14 hydroxycinnamic acids, 3 benzoic acids, 5 flavonoids, and 1 lignan were detected in the broccoli leaf blades, whereas 10 glucosinolates, 1 nitrile, 1 isothiocyanate, 11 hydroxycinnamic acids, 3 benzoic acids, 0 flavonoid, and 1 lignan were detected in the petioles. Antioxidant activity was consistently high in the leaf blades, indicating greater accumulation of bioactive compounds in the blades. Furthermore, broccoli leaf blades were subjected to different cooking methods (boiling, steaming, and sous-vide) to assess changes in antioxidant activities, and sulforaphane content. Significant differences were observed depending on the cooking method, with steaming and sous-vide methods demonstrating greater antioxidant activity than that of boiling. Although both boiling and steaming resulted in a reduction in sulforaphane content compared with that of the raw samples, the sous-vide method led to an increase in sulforaphane content. In conclusion, broccoli leaf blades have superior phytochemical composition and antioxidant activities, and when broccoli leaf blades are cooked sous-vide, the retention of bioactive compounds is the highest, suggesting that health functional foods can be developed through food upcycling.

Indexed as

antioxidant activitiesbroccoli leavescooking methodsphytochemicalssulforaphane

Identifiers

PMID41200212
PMCPMC12586360

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.