Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41200295›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025

Antimicrobial resistance of coagulase-negative

Andrea Núñez, Rodrigo Castro, Pamela Thomson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea NúñezEscuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales, Universidad Católica del Maule, Curicó, Chile.
Rodrigo CastroEscuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Facultad de Recursos Naturales y Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad Santo Tomás, Chile.
Pamela ThomsonEscuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The microbiota of the external ear of cats comprises different types of bacteria that can change due to intrinsic or extrinsic factors. Coagulase-negative Aim: This study aimed to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of CoNS strains obtained from the external ear of healthy cats in Talca, Chile, as a possible zoonotic risk. Methods: Ear swabs were obtained from 31 healthy cats. Bacterial culture and morphological analysis were performed on the samples. MALDI-TOF was used to identify CoNS strains, which were tested against a panel of 11 antibiotics using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Fisher's exact test was used to determine the association between the epidemiological variables of the patients and the antimicrobial susceptibility of CoNS strains. Results: Nine CoNS strains were isolated from the ear of seven healthy cats (prevalence 22.58%). Conclusion: The ears of healthy cats can act as a reservoir for antibiotic-resistant CoNS, with a potential risk of transmission to humans. These preliminary results are the first to be reported in Talca, Chile.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialEar CanalStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcusAnimalsCatsChileCoagulaseFemaleMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoagulaseAntimicrobial resistanceEarHealthy catStaphylococcus

Identifiers

PMID41200295
PMCPMC12587894

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.