Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41200664›Full record

SynthesisF1000Research2024

Advances in Leukemia detection and classification: A Systematic review of AI and image processing techniques.

Aya Achir, Ikram Debbarh, Nadia Zoubir, Ilham Battas, Hicham Medromi, Fouad Moutaouakkil

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in F1000Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aya AchirResearch Foundation for Research Development and Innovation in Science and Engineering, Casablanca, Grand Casablanca, Morocco.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1734-3002
Ikram DebbarhResearch Foundation for Research Development and Innovation in Science and Engineering, Casablanca, Grand Casablanca, Morocco.
Nadia ZoubirResearch Foundation for Research Development and Innovation in Science and Engineering, Casablanca, Grand Casablanca, Morocco.
Ilham BattasResearch Foundation for Research Development and Innovation in Science and Engineering, Casablanca, Grand Casablanca, Morocco.
Hicham MedromiResearch Foundation for Research Development and Innovation in Science and Engineering, Casablanca, Grand Casablanca, Morocco.
Fouad MoutaouakkilEngineering Research Laboratory (LRI), National High School of Electricity and Mechanic (ENSEM), University Hassan II Casablanca, Casablanca, Grand Casablanca, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Leukemia, a heterogeneous group of blood cancers, poses significant challenges to global health due to its complexity, diverse risk factors, and variable outcomes. Accurate and early diagnosis is critical but remains a significant hurdle, particularly in low-resource settings. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and image processing offer transformative solutions to improve leukemia detection and classification, addressing limitations in traditional diagnostic methods. Methods: This study systematically reviewed over 25,000 scientific articles sourced from Scopus, employing a PRISMA-guided methodology to ensure a comprehensive and rigorous analysis. The analysis focused on the application of AI, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), in diagnosing four primary leukemia types: acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). It also examined global epidemiological trends, risk factors, and disparities in healthcare access. Results: Key risk factors for leukemia include genetic syndromes like Down syndrome, environmental exposures to toxins such as benzene, ionizing radiation, and viral infections. Socio-economic disparities and geographical differences significantly impact leukemia incidence and outcomes. AI-based models, especially CNNs, demonstrated enhanced accuracy, speed, and reliability in diagnosing leukemia compared to traditional methods. However, challenges such as data variability, model scalability, and unequal access to AI technologies continue to hinder widespread adoption. Conclusion: AI and image processing technologies hold immense potential to revolutionize leukemia diagnostics by enabling early detection, precise classification, and personalized treatment planning. Addressing critical challenges, including data standardization and equitable access to these technologies, will be vital for global application. This review highlights the transformative role of AI in improving leukemia outcomes and advancing precision medicine worldwide.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLeukemiaHumansNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial Intelligence in Medical DiagnosticsCancer EpidemiologyConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep Learning ModelsDiagnostic Accuracy.Hematologic MalignanciesLeukemia ClassificationMachine Learning Algorithms

Identifiers

PMID41200664
PMCPMC12586985

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.