ReviewCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
ICIs Exceptional Long Response in TNBC: Addressing the Issue of Optimal ICIs Duration. Two Cases and Review of the Literature.
Review in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy, safety, and PD-L1-defined outcomes of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- ICIs Exceptional Long Response in TNBC: Addressing the Issue of Optimal ICIs Duration. Two Cases and Review of the Literature.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women, with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) being an aggressive subtype associated with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. TNBC is known for its immunogenic characteristics, including high genetic instability and elevated tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown efficacy in TNBC treatment, but the optimal treatment duration in case of prolonged response remains unclear. CASE: This case series here reported presents two patients with metastatic TNBC who demonstrated an excellent response to ICI therapy. The first patient, a 60-year-old, was enrolled in a Phase I clinical trial and received a combination of anti-PD-1, anti-LAG-3, and anti-CSF-1 monoclonal antibodies. The second patient, a 45-year-old with BRCA1-mutated TNBC, participated in a Phase II trial and received a combination of avelumab (anti-PD-L1) and talazoparib (PARP inhibitor). Both patients achieved a complete radiological response (CR), which has been maintained for 5 years. A literature review performed here identified seven additional long-term ICI responders in metastatic TNBC. While ICIs showed significant efficacy in some patients, variability in PD-L1 expression and TILs suggests that other factors may influence response. Two patients in previous studies discontinued ICIs after 2 years without progression, prompting questions about the optimal treatment duration.
conclusionICIs optimal treatment duration remains uncertain. Literature on metastatic melanoma suggests that discontinuing ICIs after a complete response rarely leads to recurrence. Prospective studies and emerging biomarkers, such as circulating tumor DNA, may help tailor treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.