Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41200857›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2025

Firsekibart as a Prophylactic Treatment for Acute Gout Flare in Participants Initiating Urate-Lowering Therapy: A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Active-Controlled Trial.

Yiyun Yu, Yu Xue, Jiankang Hu, Ning Zhang, Rongbin Li, Hongtao Guo, Long Qian, Wei Gou, Jing Yang, Li Mao and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yiyun YuDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6033-661X
Yu XueDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiankang HuPingxiang People's Hospital, Pingxiang, China.
Ning ZhangShengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Rongbin LiThe First Hospital of Qiqihar, Qiqihar, China.
Hongtao GuoThe First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Long QianThe Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Wei GouHebei Petro China Central Hospital, Langfang, China.
Jing YangMianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China.
Li MaoHuai'an First People's Hospital, Huai'an, China.
Jing YuThe Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Shengyun LiuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0426-1705
Qian XuChangchun GeneScience Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Tianhong LuoChangchun GeneScience Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Hejian ZouDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9762-2663

Funding

Changchun GeneScience Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of firsekibart versus colchicine for prophylaxis against acute gout flares in participants initiating urate-lowering therapy (ULT).

methodsIn this randomized, multicenter, open-label, active-controlled, phase 2 trial, participants were randomized (1:1:1) to receive a single subcutaneous injection of firsekibart 100 mg or 200 mg or oral colchicine 0.5 mg/day for 12 weeks. ULT was initiated at baseline or within 1 week before screening. The primary endpoint was the mean number of acute gout flares per participant over 12 weeks.

resultsA total of 162 participants received firsekibart 100 mg (n = 55), 200 mg (n = 52), or colchicine (n = 55). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. No flares were observed in the firsekibart 200 mg group within 12 weeks. The adjusted mean number of acute gout flares per participant was 0.02 with firsekibart 100 mg and 0.34 with colchicine, with a rate ratio of 0.05 (95% confidence interval 0.01-0.43; P = 0.0060). Both treatment groups receiving firsekibart (at either dose) had a lower proportion of patients with at least one acute gout flare than the colchicine group. Firsekibart had a favorable safety profile, with no treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) leading to treatment discontinuation/study withdrawal, no treatment-related serious AEs, and no deaths.

conclusionFirsekibart provided superior prophylaxis against acute gout flares compared with colchicine in patients initiating ULT, with a favorable tolerability profile, supporting its potential as a treatment option for patients with gout initiating ULT.

Identifiers

PMID41200857
PMCPMC12592937

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.