ArticleCancer medicine2025
A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study of Fruquintinib Based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-target-directed drugs: new additions in 2025 and post-marketing safety surveillance of drugs marketed in 2022-2024.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Review
- Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome across 22 VEGF-pathway inhibitors in the FDA adverse event reporting system: reporting patterns and reporting-interval characteristics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Real-world safety profile of alectinib: a 10-year pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study of Fruquintinib Based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFruquintinib is a highly selective small-molecule inhibitor that targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and is approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Given its increasing clinical adoption, a comprehensive pharmacovigilance evaluation of the adverse events (AEs) is warranted.
methodsWe conducted an analysis of fruquintinib-related AEs by mining the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, covering the period from the fourth quarter of 2023 to the first quarter of 2025. The regulatory characterization of the AEs was based on the system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT) of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). We employed four disproportionality analysis methods, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN). Furthermore, Weibull distribution modeling was employed to characterize the temporal risk patterns of adverse reactions.
resultsAmong 1632 reports in which fruquintinib was flagged as the primary suspect drug, 78 PTs met the criteria of all four algorithms. In addition to known AEs listed on the drug label, the analysis also identified previously unrecognized AEs, encompassing large intestinal obstruction, dehydration, peripheral neuropathy, renal-limited thrombotic microangiopathy, and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. The median onset time of fruquintinib-associated AEs was 18 days, with 66.16% of cases occurring within the first month of treatment.
conclusionThis pharmacovigilance study aligned with established clinical observations. Additionally, novel AEs associated with fruquintinib therapy were detected, offering valuable evidence to enhance clinical surveillance strategies and risk assessment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.