ArticleObesity surgery2025
Comparison of Mid- and Long-term Outcomes of Antrum-Resecting Versus Antrum-Preserving Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond the Procedure: Revisiting the Technical Determinants of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study is to compare the mid- and long-term results after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) according to the distance of the first staple from the pylorus.
methodsThis study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent LSG. While the distance of the first staple from the pylorus was 2-3 cm in group A, the distance of the first staple to the pylorus was 5-6 cm in group B. Laboratory parameters, comorbidity resolution, anthropometric measurements, and complications were documented at the end of the first, third, and fifth postoperative years.
resultsOf the total 376 patients, 127 were excluded for various reasons, 102 patients were lost to follow-up, and 147 patients were included in the final analysis. Upon examining the follow-up data at the 1st, 3rd, and 5th years, a statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of total weight loss (TWL%), excess body mass index loss (EBMIL%), and recurrent weight gain (RWG)%, with group A showing an advantage. The majority of the patients requiring conversional metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) were in group B, and the difference was significant (p = 0.017).
conclusionThe distance of the first staple from the pylorus may significantly influence the outcomes related to RWG%, TWL%, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) resolution in the medium-long-term. Furthermore, additional research is needed to determine the optimal positioning for enhanced patient results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41201754What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.