ArticlePloS one2025
RETRACTED: Interpretable machine learning framework for predicting Urban air quality.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retraction: Interpretable machine learning framework for predicting Urban air quality.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-02-04Compromised Peer Review · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Concerns/Issues about Article · Concerns/Issues about Methods · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban air pollution remains a critical challenge for public health and environmental sustainability. This study investigates the predictive capabilities of five machine learning (ML) models: Linear Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Support Vector Regression (SVR) for forecasting the Air Quality Index (AQI) using the widely adopted Air Quality dataset from the UCI ML Repository. Although collected in 2004-2005, the dataset continues to serve as a benchmark in recent literature and provides a reproducible testbed for methodological evaluation. After structured pre-processing, feature engineering, and chronological train-validation-test splitting, models were rigorously tuned and assessed using Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2), with 95% bootstrap confidence intervals and corrected resampled t-tests confirming statistical significance. Ensemble models achieved the best performance, with Random Forest obtaining the lowest RMSE (12.48) and MAE (9.35), and XGBoost achieving the highest R2 (0.89). Feature importance analysis identified NOx, PM2.5, and CO as the most influential predictors. We incorporated Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analyses and case-level visualizations to support interpretability, providing transparent insights for practical decision-making. While the study is limited by the absence of external validation and genetic variables (e.g., APOE), it establishes a reproducible, interpretable, and computationally efficient ML framework for AQI forecasting. The findings highlight the continuing relevance of benchmark datasets for reproducible evaluation and demonstrate the potential of interpretable ML-based approaches for smart city air quality management and public health policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.