ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Cognitive complaints in patients after cancer treatment: understanding oncologists' representations and management practices.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive disorders related to cancer treatment, although common, remain under-recognized in clinical practice. Their assessment is hampered by a lack of standardized protocols, solid evidence and adapted resources. This study aims to explore the knowledge, perceptions and practices of oncologists concerning these disorders, from a patient quality of life perspective. A qualitative community-based research study was carried out with 20 oncologists practicing in France, recruited electronically. Semi-structured interviews explored four dimensions: caregiver-patient communication, information transmission, perceptions of cognitive impairment, and management strategies. A reflective thematic analysis was carried out, with the participation of patient-researchers. Oncologists recognize the existence of cognitive disorders as a possible side effect of treatment, but perceive them as multifactorial and often trivialized. These disorders are rarely discussed spontaneously, in the absence of an explicit complaint from the patient. Reported obstacles include a lack of training, a heavy workload, a shortage of specialized resources and diagnostic uncertainties. Interdisciplinary coordination remains limited. Post-treatment cognitive disorders represent a grey area in oncology practice. Their recognition and management require better training for professionals, systematic integration into quality-of-life assessments, and the development of structured care networks. It is recommended to create simple clinical tools, improve access to specialists, and raise awareness within healthcare teams. A patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach is essential to meet these challenges, which have yet to be fully addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41204014What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.