Evidence mapPaperPMID 41204016Full record

ReviewDiscover nano2025

Nanoparticle-based approaches for wound healing: a comprehensive review of nanomaterials enhancing tissue regeneration.

Pritam Paul, Sushruta S Hakkimane

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Chitosan-silver nanocomposites: promising alternatives for combating azole-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pritam PaulDepartment of Biotechnology, Manipal Institute of Technology Bengaluru, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7484-9778
Sushruta S HakkimaneDepartment of Biotechnology, Manipal Institute of Technology Bengaluru, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India. sushruta.s@manipal.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3675-7422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing is a complex biological process involving multiple stages that require interactions between several cells, growth factors, and cytokines. The lack of a suitable environment, along with microbial infection, impairs the normal wound-healing process. Burns, trauma, diabetic injuries, and chronic ulcers are the most prevalent types of wounds on the skin. Conventional wound treatments, with their focus on a single aspect, often fail to consider the complex conditions fully surrounding the pathogens that cause infections. Nanotechnology, a rapidly developing and cutting-edge field, facilitates tissue engineering and drug delivery and has proven effective in tackling several wound healing challenges by delivering anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and angiogenic benefits. This review explores the wound healing process, chronic wounds, and current wound care challenges, highlighting how nanotechnology, through the use of metallic nanoparticles (such as silver, gold, and zinc oxide), polymeric systems, lipid-based carriers, and carbon-based materials, offers significant advantages and has become a crucial part of modern wound treatment. It further explores the role of nanotechnology in skin wound repair, its advantages over conventional treatment techniques, its biocompatibility, and it also highlights clinical trials using nanotech-based approaches and outlines future directions in wound healing research.

Indexed as

Chronic woundsNanostructureNanotechnologyTissue regenerationWound healing

Identifiers

PMID41204016
PMCPMC12595217

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.