ReviewDiscover nano2025
Nanoparticle-based approaches for wound healing: a comprehensive review of nanomaterials enhancing tissue regeneration.
Review in Discover nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leciplex Nanocarriers: An Optimized Platform for Thymol Delivery in Acne Management.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Advances in Nanotechnology-Assisted Delivery of TCM-Derived Bioactive Compounds for Wound Repair.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Chitosan-silver nanocomposites: promising alternatives for combating azole-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- A PVA/chitosan/gelatin scaffold incorporating salicylic acid-loaded TiO₂ nanoparticles enhances collagen I expression and accelerates cutaneous wound repair in mice.Biotechnology progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound healing is a complex biological process involving multiple stages that require interactions between several cells, growth factors, and cytokines. The lack of a suitable environment, along with microbial infection, impairs the normal wound-healing process. Burns, trauma, diabetic injuries, and chronic ulcers are the most prevalent types of wounds on the skin. Conventional wound treatments, with their focus on a single aspect, often fail to consider the complex conditions fully surrounding the pathogens that cause infections. Nanotechnology, a rapidly developing and cutting-edge field, facilitates tissue engineering and drug delivery and has proven effective in tackling several wound healing challenges by delivering anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and angiogenic benefits. This review explores the wound healing process, chronic wounds, and current wound care challenges, highlighting how nanotechnology, through the use of metallic nanoparticles (such as silver, gold, and zinc oxide), polymeric systems, lipid-based carriers, and carbon-based materials, offers significant advantages and has become a crucial part of modern wound treatment. It further explores the role of nanotechnology in skin wound repair, its advantages over conventional treatment techniques, its biocompatibility, and it also highlights clinical trials using nanotech-based approaches and outlines future directions in wound healing research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.