ArticleBMC genomics2025
Comparative transcriptomic analysis of perfluoroalkyl substances-induced responses of exponential and stationary phase Escherichia coli.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microbial and molecular approaches for PFAS transformation in soils: prospects and limitations.RSC advances · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are highly stable chemical contaminants of emerging concern for human and environmental health due to their non-natural chemistry, widespread use, and environmental persistence. Despite conventional metrology, mitigation strategies, and removal technologies, the complexity of this growing problem necessitates alternative approaches to tackle the immense challenges associated with complex environmental PFAS contamination. Recently, biology has emerged as an alternative approach to detect and mitigate PFAS and understand the molecular-level responses of living organisms to these compounds. However, little is understood of the impacts of PFAS on the environment, particularly impacts on microorganisms that play pivotal roles in nearly every ecosystem. Therefore, further study is needed to understand how microorganisms respond to different PFAS across growth phases.
resultsIn this study, we performed RNA sequencing at mid-exponential, early stationary phase, and late stationary phase of bacterial growth to determine the global transcriptional response of a model chassis, Escherichia coli MG1655, induced by two PFAS, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA), and equivalent non-fluorinated carboxylic acids (NFCA), octanoic acid and dodecanoic acid. Differential gene expression analysis revealed PFOA and PFDoA induced distinct changes in gene expression throughout cultivation. Specifically, we identified significant changes in expression of the formate regulon and sulfate assimilation at mid-exponential phase and ferrous iron transport, central metabolism, the molecular chaperone network, and motility processes during stationary phase. Importantly, many of these changes were distinct from changes induced by NFCAs across growth phases.
conclusionsIn summary, we find PFAS induce a system-level change in gene expression of metabolic, transport, and regulatory pathways, providing insight into how these non-natural chemicals interact with a model bacterium at various growth phases. In addition, the transcriptomic dataset presented could enable the development of future real-time environmental monitoring and mitigation technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.