ArticleBMC primary care2025
Diabetes management at the grass-root level without gatekeeping: exploring the association between primary care seeking and health outcomes.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn countries without a gatekeeping system, including China, promoting primary healthcare (PHC) utilization can improve system efficiency and reduce healthcare burden. However, evidence on diabetes patients' PHC utilization and its impact on health outcomes remains limited. This study employs continuity of care (COC) to examine care-seeking behavior at PHC institutions in China and assess its association with clinical outcomes and healthcare costs.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study in Yuhuan, Zhejiang Province, China, including 3,672 patients newly diagnosed with diabetes between 2016 and 2019. Data from chronic disease management records, follow-up service records, and electronic medical records from 2020 to 2023 were linked. COC was assessed from 2020 to 2022 using standard measures including the Continuity of Care Index (COCI), Usual Provider of Care (UPC), and Sequential Continuity (SECON), as well as PHC-specific measures: the Primary Healthcare Index (PHCI) and a binary indicator for having the primary healthcare institution as the usual provider of care (PHC-UPC). We evaluated clinical outcomes (hospitalization, glycemic control) and healthcare costs in 2023. Logistic and linear regression models were used to assess association, adjusting for patient demographics and clinical characteristics.
resultsThe mean PHCI was 0.73. Higher PHCI was significantly associated with decreased outpatient costs (P < 0.001), decreased inpatient costs (P < 0.001), and a lower likelihood of hospitalization (OR = 0.503, P < 0.001). Similarly, having used a PHC-UPC was associated with reduced outpatient and inpatient costs (P < 0.001) and a lower likelihood of hospitalization (OR = 0.708, P < 0.001). However, among patients with poorly controlled diabetes, neither PHCI nor having used a PHC-UPC showed a positive association with glycemic control (OR = 0.496, P = 0.003; OR = 0.629, P = 0.002).
conclusionsContinuity at PHC significantly lowers hospitalization and healthcare costs in China's non-gatekeeping system. However, no significant improvement in glycemic control among poorly controlled diabetes was observed. Strengthening PHC capacity for personalized diabetes management and timely hospital referrals is essential to optimize outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.