Evidence mapPaperPMID 41204191Full record

SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2025

Diagnostic value of long noncoding RNAs MIAT and MALAT1 in coronary artery disease: a systematic review and diagnostic accuracy test meta-analysis.

Khatere Roozbehi, Davood Semirani-Nezhad, Behnam Alipour, Pardis Javadian, Mohammad Sadeghi, Mina Mashayekh, Farshid Javdani, Armin Attar, Alireza Hosseinpour, Mani Khorsand Askari and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Khatere RoozbehiCardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. khatere.roozbehi@gmail.com.
Davood Semirani-NezhadCardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Behnam AlipourDepartment of Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Paramedicine, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.
Pardis JavadianMedical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad SadeghiMedical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mina MashayekhDepartment of Community Medicine, Shiraz Nephro-Urology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Farshid JavdaniResearch Center for Non-Communicable Diseases, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.
Armin AttarDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Alireza HosseinpourDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mani Khorsand AskariAssistant Professor Clerkship Director Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, USA.
Mahour FarzanClinical Biochemistry Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) MALAT1 and MIAT modulate atherosclerotic progression and myocardial ischemia injury, through vascular endothelial dysfunction. Diagnostic values of these lncRNAs in detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) have been investigated, but the results have been inconsistent. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of lncRNAs MALAT1 and MIAT.

methodsA comprehensive search was done to identify case-control studies reporting diagnostic measures of MIAT and MALAT1 in patients with CAD compared to healthy controls. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 checklist. All analyses were conducted in R software. Hierarchical models were applied to pooled diagnostic performance metrics. We used the “meta” package to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for MALAT1, and to pool sensitivity and specificity for both lncRNAs. We also used the “mada” package to estimate the positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Meta-regression analyses based on mean age and male percentage were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.

resultsTen studies were included, encompassing a total of 1,879 individuals (1009 CAD cases and 870 healthy controls) with a mean age of 59.24 years. The diagnostic performance of lncRNA MALAT1 showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.68 and specificity of 0.70, with an AUC of 0.746 and a DOR of 5.17 (95% CI: 2.26–11.85), showing acceptable diagnostic power. For lncRNA MIAT, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.81 and 0.65, respectively, with an AUC of 0.757 and a DOR of 7.64 (95% CI: 2.12–27.47), indicating moderate accuracy. The prognostic value of MALAT1 in CAD was assessed, showing a significant association with disease outcomes (OR = 2.81, 95% CI: 1.04–7.56).

conclusionsThis study indicates that both MALAT1 and MIAT demonstrate moderate diagnostic accuracy for CAD, with limitations in their clinical utility. MALAT1 also appears to have prognostic potential, suggesting its broader clinical relevance. Further research in standardized clinical settings is needed to validate these findings and clarify their practical applications in CAD diagnosis and management.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseRNA, Long NoncodingAgedBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkersMALAT1 long non-coding RNA, humanMiat long non-coding RNARNA, Long NoncodingBiomarkerCoronary artery diseaseDiagnostic accuracyLong non-coding RNAMALAT1Meta-analysisMIAT

Identifiers

PMID41204191
PMCPMC12595793

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.