ArticleTrials2025
Efficacy and safety evaluation of a reusable advanced hemostatic device (Vi-Sealer) during total laparoscopic hysterectomy in South Korea (KGOG4009/Vi-TLH trial): study protocol for a multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05629611 (Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Advanced Vessel Sealing Device), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Advanced Vessel Sealing Device (Vi-sealer)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdvanced hemostatic devices (AHDs) are widely utilized in gynecologic minimally invasive surgeries. These AHDs control ultrasonic or bipolar electric/thermal energy with a feedback mechanism and effectively seal vessels without thermal spread. However, most AHDs are single-use, potentially increasing surgical costs. Vi-Sealer, a reusable AHD with an interchangeable blade, aims to address this issue. This study assesses operative outcomes and complications to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Vi-Sealer compared to other AHDs.
methodsThis multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial compares Vi-Sealer with other AHDs in 280 patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for benign gynecologic diseases, assuming a 25-min (20%) non-inferiority margin in operative time. Cases with uterine or preinvasive cervical pathology were included, while those with huge tumor size were excluded. Participants are stratified into two cohorts based on competing devices. Each cohort consists of 140 participants, randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo TLH with either Vi-Sealer or a comparator device-LigaSure in cohort 1 and other AHDs in cohort 2. This study will be conducted at university-affiliated hospitals in South Korea, where recruitment will be carried out within the gynecology clinics. The enrollment is planned to begin in November 2022. Participants will be blinded, whereas surgeons will not be due to the nature of surgery. The primary endpoint is operation time (min) defined as the duration of the initial skin incision to the completion of skin closure, while secondary endpoints include blood loss (mL), medical cost (won), operating surgeons' device function scores, and adverse events. Outcomes will be analyzed separately for each cohort. Adverse events and complications will be assessed clinically until postoperative follow-up, per CTCAE. This trial is currently in the recruitment phase with active enrollment ongoing. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost analysis of the reusable Vi-Sealer in TLH. Through the comparison of AHDs, this is expected to provide robust evidence to determine whether the Vi-Sealer is non-inferior to disposable AHDs.
trial registrationThis study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05629611) on November 29, 2022 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05629611?intr=vi-sealer&rank=1 ) and cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0008008) on December 13, 2022 ( https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=23737&search_page=L ). This is currently open for enrollment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.