ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2025
Diversity of glyphosate-degrading bacteria and degradation genes from Xinjiang cotton field's unique soil environment.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Exploration ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Kinetic study of glyphosate biodegradation by actinobacterial consortium RH1: implications for bioremediation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To clarify the diversity of glyphosate-degrading bacteria and genes in arid and alkaline soil environments, an efficient bacterial community, named CW, was enriched from the long-term continually cropped saline-alkali cotton soil in Xinjiang. This community could degrade 500 mg/L of glyphosate within 36 h in MSM medium with a pH of 8.0. The CW community was mainly composed of over 20 genera belonging to the phyla Pseudomonadota, Bacillota, and Bacteroidota. Notable genera include Hyphomicrobium, Pseudoxanthomonas, and Aquamicrobium. From this community, twenty-four strains showing glyphosate-degrading ability, representing 9 different genera, were successfully isolated. Notably, 14 strains belonging to six specific genera- Aquamicrobium (6), Shinella (2), Pseudoxanthomonas (2), Nocardioides (1), Chitinophaga (1), and Pseudomonas (2)- displayed complete degradation (100%). In addition, this study marks the first report confirming Aquamicrobium and Shinella as novel genera degrading glyphosate. During the degradation of glyphosate by the bacterial community CW, intermediate metabolites such as AMPA and phosphate were detected. Besides, sarcosine was detected during the degradation by the bacterial strain W6/W7. A detailed analysis of the glyphosate-degrading genes revealed that, besides the thiO, GAT, and phnY gene sequences, the genome of bacterial strain W6/W7 also harbors sequences with high similarity to the previously reported glyphosate-degrading genes soxA, aroA, dadA, phnJ, phnD, and phnA. Notably, the community CW efficiently expressed all the genes. Additionally, genes associated with phosphonate, hypophosphonate, oxalate, and dicarboxylate metabolism were co-expressed during glyphosate degradation. This study reveals that, even in the unique soil environment of Xinjiang, there exists a highly diverse bacterial community which can completely and efficiently degrade glyphosate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.