Evidence mapPaperPMID 41204274Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Relationship between prior pregnancy loss and subsequent adverse pregnancy outcomes in women.

Ling Liu, Jian Zhang, Ruifang Wang, Wei Zhang, Kexin Wang, Fang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ling Liu *Department of Reproductive Medicine, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, No.82 Cuiyingmen, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Jian ZhangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, No.82 Cuiyingmen, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Ruifang Wang *Department of Reproductive Medicine, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, No.82 Cuiyingmen, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, No.82 Cuiyingmen, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Kexin WangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, No.82 Cuiyingmen, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Fang WangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, No.82 Cuiyingmen, Lanzhou, 730000, China. ery_fwang@lzu.edu.cn.

Funding

Medical Innovation and Development Project of Lanzhou University Grant No. lzuyxcx-2022-137The Science Foundation of Lanzhou University Second Hospital Grant No. YJS-BD-19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy loss is a prevalent issue among women of childbearing age and can have significant physical and psychological consequences for patients and their families. However, the association between the number of previous pregnancy loss and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) in subsequent pregnancies remains uncertain. This study aimed to provide clinical data to determine whether the number of previous pregnancy loss increases the risk of APOs in women with a history of pregnancy loss. We conducted a cohort-based, nested case-control study involving 1074 women with a history of pregnancy loss. Detailed demographic and medical history information was collected at baseline, and biological specimens were retained for laboratory testing. APOs were selected as the primary outcome, with cases defined as individuals who experienced any APO events. Cases were matched with event-free control subjects at a 1:2 ratio. Using conditional logistic regression, we examined the relationship between the number of previous pregnancy loss and APO events, using age at first pregnancy as the reference exposure. Among the study participants, we identified 358 cases with APO events and 716 controls. The occurrence of APOs was found to be associated with an increased number of previous pregnancy loss exposures compared to controls without APOs, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.36 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.14 to 1.61. This association persisted even after adjusting for patient demographics, the total number of previous pregnancies, and other exposures, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.75 and a 95% CI of 1.28 to 2.4. Furthermore, our study also indicated that age at first pregnancy within a certain range may be a risk factor for APOs. In conclusion, our findings suggest that an increased number of previous pregnancy loss is associated with a higher risk of APOs in subsequent pregnancies among women with a history of pregnancy loss. These results provide valuable clinical data and underscore the importance of considering the number of previous pregnancy loss when assessing the risk of APOs in this population. Additionally, age at first pregnancy may also play a role in APO risk. Further research is warranted to better understand the mechanisms underlying these associations and to develop appropriate interventions to mitigate the risks associated with pregnancy loss.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousPregnancy OutcomeAdultCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsOdds RatioPregnancyRisk FactorsAdverse pregnancy outcomesCohort studyPregnancy lossPrevious miscarriagesRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID41204274
PMCPMC12595637

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.