Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41204990›Full record

ReviewPlanta2025

Unraveling the variation, phylogeny, and taxonomy of Lactuca spp. for germplasm management and breeding.

Aleš Lebeda, Ľuboš Majeský, Eva Křístková, David C A Pink, Ivan Simko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aleš LebedaDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Palacký University in Olomouc, Šlechtitelů 27, 779 00, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ales.lebeda@upol.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3601-583X
Ľuboš MajeskýDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Palacký University in Olomouc, Šlechtitelů 27, 779 00, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-5703
Eva KřístkováDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Palacký University in Olomouc, Šlechtitelů 27, 779 00, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1816-5500
David C A PinkEmeritus Professor, Department of Crop Science, Harper-Adams University, Newport, UK.
Ivan SimkoAgricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Sam Farr United States Crop Improvement and Protection Research Center, Salinas, CA, 93905, USA. ivan.simko@usda.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8769-8477

Funding

Ministerstvo Zemědělství NPGZ-M/03-023Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci IGA_PrF_2025_001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionThis review describes the taxonomy, phylogeny, and diversity of wild Lactuca spp. and their relationship to cultivated lettuce (Lactuca sativa). The value of the different species as sources of useful variation for a range of economically important traits is detailed and the case is made for the conservation of more accessions in global genebanks. The integration of knowledge from research using the wild and domesticated species is highlighted. Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is an annual species in the family Asteraceae (formerly Compositae). It is a widely cultivated leafy vegetable and one of the oldest domesticated crops. In addition to their high nutritional value, lettuce plants are aesthetically pleasing. A range of lettuce morphotypes has been developed to suit various production systems, meet the demands of the processing industry, and to satisfy consumer demand. Disease- and pest-resistant cultivars are a priority, as pesticide application is often not possible because of potential pesticide-related health risks due to lettuce's relatively short cultivation period. Wild Lactuca species closely related to lettuce were first utilized in breeding programs in the early twentieth century in USA and later in Europe. They continue to play a vital role in modern breeding as sources of resistance to important diseases and pests, tolerance to abiotic stresses (e.g., salinity, drought, temperature), and sources of variation in leaf taste, structure, and secondary-metabolite composition. The importance of wild Lactuca species in lettuce crop improvement extends beyond the close relatives of the crop. A thorough understanding of the taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships within the genus Lactuca provides insight into the history of domestication of lettuce, the management of genebank collections, and the utilization of germplasm in breeding and genetic studies. This knowledge aids identification and functional analysis of key genes and development of molecular markers for lettuce improvement. Current research supports the classification of L. serriola L. as the direct progenitor of cultivated lettuce, with the Middle East and Egypt identified as two centers of domestication. Lactuca virosa L. and L. saligna L. have also been utilized in lettuce breeding over the past 20-30 years and there has been an increased interest in exploiting other Lactuca species in recent years. Despite their importance, wild Lactuca species remain underrepresented in public-sector genebanks, with only a limited number of accessions available. Challenges, such as incomplete biogeographic and ecological data and frequent miss-identification of accessions, hinder the effective management and use of the collections in breeding programs. Recent studies have advanced our understanding of relationships within the subtribe Lactucinae, but the taxonomy of this lineage remains unresolved. The current taxonomic classification recognizes 73 Lactuca spp.; however, further research is needed to confirm species delineation and refine their classification. This paper proposes two potential approaches to address the unresolved taxonomy of Lactucinae: either recognizing each monophyletic unit as a distinct genus or adopting a broader definition of the genus Lactuca to encompass its diverse lineages.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationLactucaPhylogenyPlant BreedingCrops, AgriculturalBiogeographyDomesticationGenetic variationGenotypingLettucePhenotyping

Identifiers

PMID41204990
PMCPMC12598711

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.