ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2025
Multiprofessional Interventions for Frailty in Patients with Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Core Competencies of the Modern Geriatric Cardiologist: A Framework for Comprehensive Cardiovascular Care in Older Adults.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Interaction between depressive symptoms and social support on frailty risk among patients with chronic heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Acute Heart Failure in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A State-of-the-art Review from an International Expert Group.Cardiac failure review · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewFrailty is a prevalent and clinically significant condition affecting up to 45% of adults with heart failure (HF). Frailty reflects a state of reduced physiologic reserve and vulnerability to stressors, which profoundly influences health outcomes including health care utilization and survival. Frailty and HF interact through multiple overlapping pathophysiologic mechanisms, including chronic inflammation, neurohormonal abnormalities, and multiorgan dysfunction. This synergy, for the patient leads to poor physical performance, reduced independence, and a greater susceptibility to complications. RECENT
findingsEvidence from recent clinical trials focused on frailty in HF underscores the potential benefits of multicomponent interventions combined with medication optimisation target physical dysfunction, poor nutrition, psychological disorders, and social isolation. Multidisciplinary care teams – including cardiologists, nurses, physical therapists, dieticians, occupational therapists, and social workers – can implement tailored strategies to reverse or slow the progression of frailty to improve health outcomes of patients with HF. Interventions such as resistance and balance training, individualised nutritional supplementation, medication review, cognitive and psychological support, and caregiver education have demonstrated a range of benefits in HF, from enhanced physical capacity and reduced hospital readmissions to improved health-related quality of life. Managing frailty in patients with HF requires a personalised, holistic and multicomponent approach. Successful intervention involves addressing not only physical dysfunction but also psychological, nutritional, and social factors that collectively undermine health and independence. Integrating multicomponent care into routine practice has the potential to improve clinical outcomes, reduce health care utilisation, and enhance the overall well-being of patients. Future research should aim to identify the most effective combinations of interventions, clarify mechanisms of action, and determine cost-efficiency in health care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.