ReviewJournal of sport and health science2025
Trends in physical fitness among children and adolescents in Europe: A systematic review and meta-analyses during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Review in Journal of sport and health science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Change and Tracking of Health-Related Physical Fitness in Adolescents Aged 12-16 Years: A Structured Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- A social-ecological examination of physical activity and fitness among Chinese university students: a cross-sectional path analysis.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Health-related physical fitness in children and adolescents and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: Signals of convergence.Journal of sport and health science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhysical fitness is a key indicator of current and future health in children and adolescents. Evidence suggests that fitness levels have declined then stagnated in recent decades, but it remains unclear how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted this trend.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses to assess pandemic-related changes in physical fitness among children and adolescents (0-19 years) in the World Health Organization European Region. Seven databases were searched up to February 28, 2025 for studies reporting validated pre- and during/post-pandemic fitness measurements. Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessment (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Exposure) (ROBINS-E), and certainty grading (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) (GRADE). Random-effects meta-analyses yielded standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). Subgroup analyses examined sex, age, year, and national restriction severity (Oxford Stringency Index).
resultsThirty-two studies comprising 270,179 participants and 1,519,386 fitness measurements from 17 European countries were included. Cardiorespiratory fitness declined significantly during the pandemic, especially in 2021, with reductions in endurance (SMD = -0.43; 95%CI: -0.61 to -0.25) and speed (SMD = -0.29; 95%CI: -0.61 to 0.03). While speed returned to baseline by 2023, endurance remained below pre-pandemic levels (SMD = -0.10; 95%CI: -0.12 to -0.08). Girls and adolescents were disproportionately affected. In contrast to cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular fitness remained largely unchanged. Stricter national regulations were associated with greater declines in cardiorespiratory fitness.
conclusionCOVID-19 pandemic restrictions were associated with a marked decline in cardiorespiratory fitness in European children and adolescents, with levels not recovered by 2023. These findings call for urgent, targeted public health interventions to improve physical fitness and prevent long-term health consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.