ArticleBiology of reproduction2026
The utility of artificial intelligence and deep learning to automate and accelerate follicle counts in human ovarian tissue†.
Article in Biology of reproduction, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in ovarian pathophysiology and management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Pooled it
- Follicle identification in primate ovaries via machine learning†.Biology of reproduction · 2026Article
- Ovarian tissue quality assessment and fertility preservation strategies enabled by multi-omics and artificial intelligence: current applications and clinical perspectives.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Follicles comprised of oocytes and surrounding cells are essential for reproductive function. They are fixed before birth and decrease thereafter through a process of activation, growth, and apoptosis. The advent of ovarian tissue cryopreservation is critical for fertility preservation and has allowed us to evaluate follicle numbers and folliculogenesis in humans. However, current histopathological assessments are labor intensive and subject to interobserver variability. We developed an AI-based method that integrates deep learning segmentation and object detection to automate follicle counting in whole-slide images (WSIs) of ovarian tissue. Using 1857 WSIs from 47 patients and 8300 annotated follicles, our method employs DeepLabV3+ for segmentation and Faster R-CNN for object detection. Predictions from both models are merged, and performance metrics (Dice coefficient, sensitivity, and positive predictive value) were calculated pre- and post-failure analysis. The segmentation model achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.4939, while the object detection model achieved a COCOmetric score 0.27. The merged results of both models performed with a sensitivity of 0.92 and PPV of 0.95, after manual correction of annotations. Our AI-driven approach enhances follicle quantitation accuracy and reproducibility, representing a promising tool to support research and clinical decision-making in fertility preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.