ReviewPituitary2025
Radiolabeling molecular biomarkers of invasive pituitary adenomas: a narrative review.
Review in Pituitary, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePituitary adenoma, are common intracranial neoplasms that can exhibit invasive behavior, leading to increased morbidity, recurrence, and resistance to treatment. Identifying biomarkers associated with tumor invasiveness could improve early diagnosis and guide therapeutic interventions. This review evaluates molecular biomarkers linked to pituitary adenoma invasiveness and explores the potential of radiolabeling for noninvasive detection.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed and Embase databases was conducted to identify studies evaluating molecular markers associated with invasive pituitary adenoma. Biomarkers were selected based on their proposed role in tumor invasion, and evidence supporting their clinical relevance was summarized. Additionally, existing radiolabeling techniques for biomarker detection were reviewed.
resultsFive key biomarker groups were identified: matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) system, myosin 5 A (MYO5A), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and survivin. MMPs were strongly linked to extracellular matrix degradation and invasion, while uPA facilitated invasion via MMP activation. MYO5A and survivin were implicated in epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumor motility, and VEGF promoted angiogenesis. Radiolabeling techniques for MMPs, uPA/uPAR, VEGF, and survivin demonstrated feasibility for imaging tumor invasiveness, though limitations such as non-specific tracer accumulation remain.
conclusionsThis review highlights the potential of molecular biomarkers in predicting pituitary adenoma invasiveness and the emerging role of radiolabeled probes in noninvasive imaging. Future research should focus on validating these biomarkers in longitudinal studies and refining radiolabeling techniques to improve diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic targeting of invasive pituitary adenomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.