ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage2026
Usefulness of 3D joint space width on weight-bearing CT in comparison with 2D joint space width on radiographs for predicting 24-month worsening of knee osteoarthritis pain and function in the MOST study.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Baseline 3D joint space width on weight-bearing CT in comparison with 2D JSWOsteoarthritis imaging · 2026Article
- Weight-bearing computed tomography in knee pathologies: current evidence and future perspectives.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study compared the predictive validity of three-dimensional joint space width (3D-JSW) on weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) versus two-dimensional joint space width at predetermined mediolateral locations (2D-JSW
designData from 302 participants (425 knees) in the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) were analyzed. Baseline assessments included bilateral standing radiographs for 2D-JSW
resultsParticipants had a mean age of 63.2±8.9 years and body mass index (BMI) of 28.2±4.8 kg/m². Over 24 months, 38 knees exhibited worsening WOMAC pain, with no significant association for either 3D-JSW or 2D-JSW
conclusions3D-JSW on WBCT did not outperform 2D-JSW
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.