ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2025
Climate-related disasters and biological aging based on DNA methylation: a twin and family study in Australian women.
Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Population epigenetics: deciphering DNA methylation diversity and its implications for health, disease, and evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWeather-related disasters are devastating and may exhibit greater intensity globally under a changing climate, leaving survivors with greater and sustained health risks. However, the potential epigenetic mechanisms underlying the persistent adverse health impacts remain unclear. We aimed to examine the association between tropical cyclones (TCs) or flood exposure and biological aging based on DNA methylation.
methodsWe analysed peripheral blood samples from 479 women in 130 families across Australia and derived six metrics of DNA methylation age acceleration (DNAmAgeAC) for each participant, including Horvath's, Hannum's, and Zhang's DNAmAge, PhenoAge, and GrimAge versions 1 (GrimAge1) and 2 (GrimAge2). Linear mixed-effect and distributed lag nonlinear models accounting for familial clustering and delayed effects were used to estimate the DNAmAgeAC associated with TCs or flood exposure.
resultsTCs or flood exposures were generally associated with higher DNAmAgeAC of various metrics, which persisted for ≤6 months after exposure. Overall, participants exposed to TCs or floods had higher DNAmAgeAC based on Horvath's age [2.66 years, 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.94 to 8.27; P = .357], Hannum's age (6.81 years, 95% CI: 1.75-11.88; P = .008), PhenoAge (8.96 years, 95% CI: 2.35-15.57; P = .008), Zhang's age (0.93 years, 95% CI: -0.56 to 2.42; P = .224), GrimAge1 (2.60 years, 95% CI: -0.64 to 5.83; P = .115), and GrimAge2 (4.31 years, 95% CI: 0.52-8.09; P = .026). Socioeconomic status, age, smoking, and drinking behaviors modified the associations, with generally stronger adverse associations observed among the participants living in lower socioeconomic areas, <60 years of age, with higher smoking indices, or being current/former drinkers. The adverse associations were partially mediated by a shift in leucocyte distributions, particularly the change in the proportions of naive CD8+ T cells, exhausted cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, and granulocytes.
conclusionTC or flood exposures were associated with accelerated biological aging measured by using DNA methylation in Australian women, especially for those living in lower socioeconomic areas, <60 years of age, who were more smokers or drinkers. The accelerated aging may be partially contributed by the potential infections and alterations in the immune status in human bodies after climate-related disasters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.