ReviewArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2025
Durability of Pulsed Field Ablation Lesions: Current Understanding and Future Directions.
Review in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pulmonary vein isolation durability in a randomized trial comparing fluoroscopy-only vs. electroanatomic mapping strategies for pulmonary vein isolation with balloon-in-basket pulsed-field ablation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Trial
- Combined Pulsed Field and Radiofrequency Ablation for Coexisting Atrial Tachycardia During or After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation. Interventional and Clinical Outcomes.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Article
- Epicardial Pulsed Field Ablation for Bachmann Bundle-Mediated Atrial Tachycardia: Expanding Indications and Identifying Limitations.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Discrimination of On-going Fibrillation in Isolated Pulmonary Vein in Non-paroxysmal AF Ablation.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2026Article
- Clinical Burden of Post-ablation Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence in East Asia: A Systematic Literature Review.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2026Review
- The Biophysics of Radiofrequency Ablation and Factors Affecting Lesion Size.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2026Review
- A Review of Potential Complications of Pulsed Field Ablation for AF: Beneath the Surface.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2026Review
- Single-Center Real World Experience with the VARIPULSE Platform for Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, and Redo Procedures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulsed field ablation (PFA) represents a paradigm shift in the catheter-based treatment of AF, offering myocardial-selective ablation through the non-thermal mechanism of irreversible electroporation. Despite promising early outcomes, the durability of PFA lesions, particularly over mid-and long-term follow-up, remains a critical area of investigation. This review incorporates preclinical and clinical data on PFA lesion durability, explores biophysical underpinnings, evaluates procedural variables influencing outcomes, and identifies ongoing challenges and future research priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.