ArticleWellcome open research2025
Strengthening Governance for Universalising Primary Oral Health Care: Perspectives from Karnataka, India.
Article in Wellcome open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Strengthening Primary Health Care for Improved Population Health and Health Equity in Somalia: A Narrative Review.Public health challenges · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Governance is central to health systems, and achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC) relies on strong, sustainable systems. However, despite UHC's broad health goals, issues like oral health receive inadequate attention, signalling inequity in health systems. In India, oral diseases are rising, yet oral health remains a low political priority, reflecting weak governance and limited state commitment to health equity. This study analysed governance factors within Karnataka's public oral healthcare system through the lens of Siddiqi's health governance assessment framework. Methods: In this exploratory qualitative study, in-depth interviews with twenty stakeholders, including administrators and program implementers, explored enablers and constraints at policy and operational levels. Data analysis was guided by the governance framework developed by Siddiqi and colleagues. Results: The findings indicate that challenges persist while Karnataka's oral health governance benefits from a separate directorate ensuring administrative functionality. These include a lack of strategic vision for oral health, inadequate policy formulation, limited social participation, insufficient budget, workforce shortages, outdated guidelines, and inequitable oral health programs. Power dynamics, particularly with district health officers, further hinder effective governance. The study reveals a siloed approach to oral health with minimal integration into broader health programs. From planning to implementation, weak governance links reflect low political will. Conclusion: Although recent attention has been given to oral health in Karnataka, substantial reforms are necessary. These include appointing oral health personnel at primary health centres, increasing budgets, revising the Indian Public Health Standards to prioritise oral health in primary care, empowering the oral health directorate, and establishing accountability and surveillance systems. Strengthening governance in these areas is essential to advance oral health equity and contribute to UHC goals in Karnataka.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.