ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2025
The Congenital Cardiac Diagnosis Translator (CCDT): Enhancing interoperability in congenital cardiac diagnosis terminology.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Congenital heart diseases (CHDs) are classified using diverse terminologies worldwide, creating barriers to effective communication and collaboration in both clinical practice and research. This project aimed to develop a tool to improve interoperability between commonly used CHD classification systems. Methods and results: The Congenital Cardiac Diagnosis Translator (CCDT) was developed by manually cross-matching diagnostic terms across six coding systems: Fyler, HPO, IPCCC, STS, ICD-10, and ICD-11. Terms were reviewed one system at a time. When an exact match was unavailable, the most specific encompassing diagnosis was selected; in cases where no suitable match existed, no translation was provided. Mappings were consolidated into a curated master lookup table. The CCDT was implemented as a web-based tool with a graphical user interface, enabling term-specific searches. Translations were qualitatively validated by clinical experts in congenital cardiology to ensure accuracy and relevance. The CCDT includes 505 unique congenital heart diagnoses cross-mapped across six coding systems. Qualitative feedback indicated that the translator is intuitive, accurate, and easy to use. Conclusions: The CCDT provides a scalable, expert-informed solution for improving interoperability across CHD classification systems. By standardizing diagnostic terminology, it supports global collaboration and data sharing in congenital cardiology. The translator is freely accessible and will continue to evolve alongside diagnostic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.