ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Vitamin D and Cardiovascular Disease: The "Good", the "Bad", and the "Unknown".
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vitamin D is a key regulator of calcium and phosphorus homeostasis; meanwhile, the dietary absence of vitamin D represents the most common nutritional deficiency worldwide. The discovery of vitamin D receptors and conversion enzymes within the cardiovascular system has fueled growing interest in the potential roles of vitamin D beyond bone health. Indeed, preclinical studies have suggested that vitamin D might regulate vascular tone and exert antifibrotic and anti-remodeling effects on the myocardium. Furthermore, a deficit in vitamin D has been associated with an increased risk of hypertension, atherosclerosis, and heart failure. These findings have prompted several interventional studies to investigate whether vitamin D supplementation can mitigate cardiovascular risk. However, current evidence regarding the cardiovascular benefits of vitamin D intake remains inconsistent and inconclusive. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the "good", the "bad", and the "unknown" aspects of the relationship between vitamin D and cardiovascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.