ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Genetic Evidence Linking Lipoprotein(a) to Cardiovascular Disease and the Potential Role of Aspirin: A Mendelian Randomization Study.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Lipoprotein(a): A Novel Risk Factor for Heart Failure and Biomarker of Prognosis? From Pathophysiology to Clinical Practice.Cardiac failure review · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Many studies have revealed the observational associations between lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) concentrations and the incidence of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, the causal associations remain unclear. Methods: Public summary data were analyzed using a Mendelian randomization (MR) design to assess the causal associations between Lp(a) levels and risks of nine CVDs and evaluate the potential impact of aspirin on Lp(a) levels. The principal analysis was conducted employing the random-effects inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method. Furthermore, the weighted median and MR-Egger approaches were used as the sensitivity analysis. Additionally, the significantly associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in salicylic acid (INTERVAL and EPIC-Norfolk, n = 14,149) were chosen to assess the potential effects of aspirin on lowering Lp(a) levels. Results: The IVW analysis showed that the per standard deviation (SD) increment in Lp(a) level was causally associated with a higher risk of coronary artery disease (odds ratio (OR), 1.237; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.173-1.303), atrial fibrillation (OR, 1.030; 95% CI, 1.011-1.050), heart failure (OR, 1.074; 95% CI, 1.053-1.096), hypertension (OR, 1.006; 95% CI, 1.004-1.008), and peripheral artery disease (OR, 1.001; 95% CI, 1.001-1.001) (all Conclusions: A causal nexus was discerned between Lp(a) levels and an increased risk of conditions including coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, hypertension, and peripheral artery disease. Furthermore, administering aspirin may be a potential therapeutic to reduce these CVD risks among individuals with elevated Lp(a) levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.