ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
A Comprehensive Review of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Epidemiology, Classification, Management Strategies, Mortality Risk Assessment, and Ethical Considerations for Patients who Refuse Blood Transfusions.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- LINC00152/miR-145-5p/KLF4 ceRNA Axis: Diagnostic and Prognostic Value in Aortic Dissection.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Centroid Regression for Preoperative Risk Assessment of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Based on Multivariate Clinical Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- De Ritis Ratio as an Independent Predictor of In-Hospital Mortality in Surgically Treated Acute Aortic Dissection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Admission creatinine level predicts postoperative acute hepatic dysfunction in patients aged ≤30 years with acute type A aortic dissection: a multi-center retrospective study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Integrated biomarker model based on cTnI, BNP, and D-dimer for early risk stratification in acute aortic dissection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular surgical emergency with a mortality of 20-25%. This review offers an overview of current research on the morphology, taxonomy, epidemiology, and anesthetic, perfusion, and surgical strategies involved in ATAAD. Moreover, this review examines methods for predicting mortality risk and explores clinician-patient interactions, particularly those involving patients who refuse blood transfusions. The literature search included PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect databases, as well as any relevant books. This review references 144 sources: 129 peer-reviewed articles and 15 book chapters or books. Modern classification systems utilize aortic zones based on the location of intimal tears and the extent of dissection; recent updates have included coronary artery dissection as an additional mapping criterion. Socioeconomic factors are linked to higher ATAAD incidence and poorer long-term survival post-surgery. The duration of global myocardial ischemia correlates with mortality and is a key element in the surgical strategy. Compared to deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA), moderate HCA with cerebral perfusion provides benefits such as reduced bleeding and improved survival. Standard prediction models may not accurately assess risks in patients with life-threatening anemia who refuse blood transfusion. Therefore, incorporating Auckland and Hamilton anemia mortality risk scores alongside conventional tools can improve prognostic accuracy and support personalized management. An interpretive-deliberative model balances patient preferences with surgical outcomes, especially in bloodless surgery. Advances in surgical and endovascular management, as well as postoperative strategies for residual aortic disease, have also been explored. Significant progress has been made in assessing in-hospital mortality, improving doctor-patient communication, refining anesthetic and perfusion techniques, and enhancing surgical management of ATAAD. However, further research is needed to validate these approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.