ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Deep learning-based no-reference quality assessment of anterior segment ultrasound biomicroscopy panoramic images.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Robust image quality evaluation in optical coherence tomography of skin using global, region-independent metrics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) enables high-resolution imaging of the anterior segment, essential for accurate diagnosis and anatomical assessment. However, the quality evaluation of UBM currently relies on subjective judgment, which is time-consuming and inconsistent. This study proposes a deep learning (DL)-based no-reference method for objective and automated UBM image quality assessment (IQA), facilitating reliable selection of high-quality images for clinical use. Methods: A total of 1,154 clinical panoramic UBM images of the anterior segment were collected from Tianjin Eye Hospital. The YOLOv8s_DW_FOCUS model was employed to accurately extract the region of interest (ROI) and identify five key anatomical landmarks: the central corneal epithelium, central corneal endothelium, posterior lens capsule, left ciliary groove, and right ciliary groove. In collaboration with clinical ophthalmologists, eight key criteria for assessing anterior segment UBM image quality were established, integrating general medical image evaluation parameters and ophthalmic expertise. Based on these criteria, each frame was assigned a quality score. Images scoring 7 or higher were classified as high-quality, whereas those receiving a perfect score of 8 were considered standard. To validate the feasibility of our method, we conducted rigorous evaluations of its accuracy, focus on key regions, generalization capability, inter- and intra-class discrimination, and consistency in assessment results. Results: The target detection model achieved a mean average precision (mAP) of 0.935, a recall of 0.898, and a precision of 0.925. Additionally, it effectively focused on key regions, as demonstrated by the heatmap analysis. The t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plot further highlighted the model's strong discriminative capability across different classes and its excellent generalization performance. To assess the consistency between our no-reference quality assessment method and expert evaluations, we analyzed 174 standard images that had been subjectively selected by clinical ophthalmologists. Among them, 146 images received a score of 8, whereas 26 images scored 7, indicating a high level of agreement with clinical experts in identifying high-quality images. Moreover, our method applies stricter criteria for defining standard images, enabling a more precise selection of high-quality anterior segment UBM images. Conclusions: The DL-based no-reference quality assessment method proposed in this study provides an objective evaluation of anterior segment UBM image quality. It effectively identifies high-quality images, significantly improving the efficiency of ophthalmic imaging professionals and demonstrating strong clinical potential for widespread adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.