ArticleTransplantation direct2025
The Role of Cytomegalovirus-specific Immunoglobulins as Modulators of Antigen-specific T-cell Expansion In Vitro.
Article in Transplantation direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cytomegalovirus-specific immunoglobulins (CMV-IVIg) can contribute to viral control after transplantation. Apart from neutralizing antiviral activity, knowledge on their potential indirect effects on the restoration of virus-specific T-cell immunity is limited. Therefore, we tested whether CMV-IVIg may affect cytokine induction and proliferation of CMV-specific T cells in vitro. Methods: Blood samples of 38 individuals (23 kidney transplant recipients and 15 immunocompetent controls) were stimulated using CMV antigens in saturating and low antigen concentration, or with the polyclonal stimulus Results: Irrespective of antigen concentration, the presence or absence of CMV-IVIg had no effect on the percentage of CMV-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells producing interferon-gamma, tumor necrosis factor, or interleukin-2. However, proliferation of CMV-specific CD3 T cells, including CD4 and CD8 T-cell subpopulations, was significantly higher in the presence of CMV-IVIg at both saturating ( Conclusions: CMV-IVIg did not have any effect on immediate T-cell effector function. However, the marked effect of CMV-IVIg on increasing the proliferation of CMV-specific T cells while concomitantly reducing polyclonal T-cell function may have implications for the therapeutic use of immunoglobulins to restore CMV-specific T cells in patients with active CMV infection without increasing the alloreactive burden.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.