ReviewJournal of physical therapy science2025
Physiological and psychological therapeutic effects of telerehabilitation treatment on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a progressive and fatal respiratory disease that affects older adults. Pulmonary rehabilitation improves symptoms and quality of life but faces barriers such as limited access. Telerehabilitation, enabled by technology, offers remote, personalized care and may overcome these barriers. Although its effectiveness is well-documented, it remains unclear whether telerehabilitation is superior or inferior to face-to-face rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment outcomes. This study aimed to systematically compare telerehabilitation and face-to-face rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. [Methods] We searched five databases for randomized controlled trials on telerehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from 2003 to 2024. Studies were screened by pre-defined criteria, and quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. Data were analyzed using RevMan 5.4 software. [Results] Eighteen randomized controlled trials (3,108 patients) were included. Telerehabilitation was less effective in improving lung function (six minute walk test) but slightly better in reducing dyspnea and symptoms (modified Medical Research Council score and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test). It was less effective for quality of life but significantly better at alleviating depression and anxiety. [Conclusion] Both methods effectively alleviated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Telerehabilitation may better reduce breathing difficulties and negative emotions, offering an alternative to face-to-face rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.