RevieweGastroenterology2025
Regulatory T cells in liver metastases: emerging and divergent roles in tumour progression.
Review in eGastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polymeric Materials in Cancer Immunotherapy: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Article
- Combinatorial Analysis of CD4Cancers · 2026Article
- Colorectal cancer liver metastasis: immunosuppressive microenvironment, signaling pathways, and emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Colorectal cancer liver metastases: mechanism and therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Long-term and short-term outcomes of curative-intent resection for elderly and younger patients with gallbladder carcinoma: a multicentre propensity score-matched cohort study.eGastroenterology · 2026Article
- TERT rs10069690 variant is linked to reduced cholangiocarcinoma incidence but adverse prognosis in patients undergoing resection.eGastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liver metastases (LMs) pose a significant burden of morbidity and mortality, resulting in a worse prognosis for many primary malignancies. Despite advancements in cancer treatment, such as immunotherapy, molecular therapies, additional lines of chemotherapy and optimisation of surgical resection, effective therapy against hepatic metastases remains elusive. Recent studies in immuno-oncology have implicated distinct tumour microenvironment (TME) signatures in the hepatic metastatic niche, which interplay with the intrinsic microenvironmental features specific to each primary tumour or organ of origin. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have been implicated in the immunosuppressive nature of the hepatic TME, yet the exact mechanisms of interaction have not been fully elucidated. Discrepancies in number, function and proportion of Tregs to other tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes have been documented, with conflicting findings in the LMs from different primary tumours. These results may be attributable to the underlying biology of each organ-specific tumour and the unique hepatic TME that forms during the stepwise progression of the metastatic cascade. In this review, we explore the often-contradicting findings of intrahepatic Tregs in LMs from different originating tumours and offer insight into potential mechanisms for these observed differences with implications for future therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.