ReviewCureus2025
Telerehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review of Its Effectiveness, Safety, and Access in the Post-COVID Era.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, affecting primarily older adults. With rising rates of obesity and population aging, the global burden of OA is expected to grow substantially. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains the definitive treatment for end-stage knee OA. However, the growing demand for postoperative rehabilitation has intensified the strain on the physical therapy (PT) workforce. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telerehabilitation, but evidence regarding its effectiveness, safety, cost-efficiency, and equity after TKA remains scattered. A narrative review of English-language, full-text articles published between January 2018 and May 2025 was performed. PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar were searched using terms including "telerehabilitation", "virtual physical therapy", and "total knee arthroplasty". Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, case series (n ≥ 10), or systematic reviews/meta-analyses that compared telerehabilitation with conventional in-person rehabilitation after TKA. Outcomes included functional metrics, e.g., Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Knee Society Score (KSS), pain (visual analog scale, VAS), patient satisfaction, adherence, cost/utilization data, and equity indicators. Eight studies (six RCTs, two meta-analyses; n ≈ 2,070) met the inclusion criteria. Interventions included AI-driven apps, video-based therapy, and wearable sensors. Most studies found telerehabilitation to be non-inferior to conventional PT in improving pain, range of motion (ROM), and function. Meta-analyses showed comparable gains in KOOS, ROM, and VAS scores. Cost-effectiveness was favorable in bundled care models, though technology costs were inconsistently reported. No increased adverse events were observed. Digital literacy and broadband access emerged as equity challenges. Telerehabilitation is a safe, effective adjunct to in-person PT following TKA, with potential to expand access and reduce system strain. Hybrid models may offer the most sustainable path forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.