Trial reportJournal of sports science & medicine2025
A Comparative Study of High-Intensity Flywheel Eccentric Training and Traditional Barbell Training on Athletic Performance in Female Basketball Players.
Trial report in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flywheel eccentric training is a type of training that combines concentric and eccentric contractions by creating inertial resistance with a flywheel device. This study compared the effects of high-intensity flywheel eccentric training and traditional barbell training on the anaerobic capacity and lower-limb strength of female college basketball players. Sixteen female Chinese University Basketball League (CUBAL) athletes from a university were recruited and randomly divided into flywheel eccentric training and traditional barbell training groups, with eight athletes in each group. They underwent two training sessions per week for 8 weeks. The athletes were assessed for their anaerobic capacity (blood lactate concentrations, peak anaerobic power, mean anaerobic power, fatigue index, 30-m sprint, T-test, and 17×15-m shuttle run), and lower-limb strength (1RM back squat, CMJ, peak power output (PPO), and isokinetic muscle strength) before and after the training intervention. After the training intervention, there was a significant difference between the flywheel eccentric training and traditional barbell training groups in each test index when compared to before and after the within-group experiment (P < 0.05). Between groups, there were significant differences in 3 min blood lactate concentrations (P < 0.05, d = 1.09), peak anaerobic power (P < 0.05; d = 1.10), mean anaerobic power (P < 0.05; d = 1.21), fatigue index (P < 0.05; d = 1.20), 30-m sprint (P < 0.05; d = 1.38), T-test (P < 0.05; d = 1.12), 17×15-m shuttle run (P < 0.05; d = 1.31), 1RM back squat (P < 0.05; d = 1.08), CMJ (P < 0.05; d = 1.11), peak power output (PPO) (P < 0.05; d = 1.26), and isokinetic muscle strength (P < 0.05). This study revealed that high-intensity flywheel eccentric training significantly enhanced the players' anaerobic capacity and lower-limb strength and led to better performance than traditional barbell training across all measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.